the ill-tempered cavalier ([info]gillen) wrote,
@ 2009-03-02 18:25:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
The proof is in the puddingheads

(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ghostwes
2009-03-03 02:29 am UTC (link)
Well, I can't fault your math.

Equally, I suppose: audience = total dickwad(s).

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]gillen
2009-03-03 02:38 am UTC (link)
It can then be shown that:

n [Total Dickwad] = [Total Dickwad]

[Total Dickwad] = 0


We can call that [info]ghostwes' Universal Negation Corollary.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]latenite_snacks
2009-03-03 03:11 am UTC (link)
You're welcome.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]gillen
2009-03-03 05:27 am UTC (link)
hmm?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]tydestra
2009-03-03 09:24 pm UTC (link)
Stee's exactly the same in person, and he said I believe that I am worse.

The whole thing I hate about dickwads is that they totally kill my buzz while playing online.

(Reply to this)


[info]substitute
2009-03-04 06:23 am UTC (link)
THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING

(Reply to this)


[info]joyinthedark
2009-03-06 10:21 am UTC (link)
As stated, your proof accounts for only the case where anonymity and audience are zero. For other cases, note that if you start with anonymity, and then remove the audience you are left with nothing (Anonymity - Audience = 0).

And we can now make the proportion Maxwell is to Faraday as Gillen is to Harry Dean Stanton ("Ordinary F***ing People: I hate 'em.")

(Reply to this)

(7 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…