the ill-tempered cavalier ([info]gillen) wrote,
@ 2006-12-09 19:45:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: hungry

Bye bye, PBJ. Hello, hypoallergenic nutrition bars.
When I was a kid, the only people I knew with allergies were adults who had hay fever. Everybody in my class ate peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and had a thermos of milk for lunch. Nobody went into anaphylactic shock. Nobody got the shits so bad they had to stay home.

In high school, my best friend was so allergic to bees that he had to carry a little "My First Heroin Addiction" self-injection kit. This was considered to be way cool and bizarre. Peanut butter had gone out of vogue, but Planters dry-roasted peanuts hadn't and were still a popular care package item. Milk was out, but milkshakes were in. And we all ate pasta. Nobody died in the cafeteria.

In college, I bumped into my first Celiac sufferer - but she was rail thin, pale and a vegan to boot. Definitely in the "not healthy" category. Even so, half of us thought she was just faking it to get off the meal plan. Peanut butter was back in, since now we could choose to eat it and even assign doing so some kind of pomo-ironic meaning, milkshakes at Chick'n'Ruth's were way in but even I was beginning to feel the tummy rumblings of a lactose intolerance that would still take more than a decade to identify.

Post-college, most of the people that I knew still lacked any food or environmental allergies (except it was now vogue among the annoying birdish-looking non-smokers, especially girls, to claim to be "allergic" to cigarette smoke. Yeah, whatev.) But then suddenly the late-Boomer parents and early-GenXers were starting to report really bizarre allergies in their kids. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches were now lethal weapons. If the nuts didn't get 'em the wheat gluten would. And the lactose-free milk industry started booming, springing up just in time to offer gastric relief to the teeming millions (myself included) who had begun to find that a simple glass of milk could turn them into toxic gas factories.

Between 1997 and 2002 alone, the rate of children suffering from peanut or other nut allergies in the US rose from 0.4% to 0.8% - doubling in only five years to one out of every 125 kids - and up from practically 0% in the 1970s-1980s. It's gotten so bad that some schools are considering adopting official "nut-free" policies. Gluten intolerance now effects 1 out of every 133 Americans. Lactose intolerance is up from 1 in 19 in 1983 to 1 in 9 (11%) just 25 years later. By some estimates, Irritable Bowel Syndrome now affects almost 10% of Americans to one degree or another.

Folks, something ain't right. I don't know if it's the aluminum in the cans, all the preservatives, or the high-fructose corn syrup, but we're killing ourselves. Worse, we're denying our children the joy of noodles with spicy peanut sauce and a mango lhassi.



(Post a new comment)


[info]si_fuller
2006-12-10 04:18 am UTC (link)
There's no question that as foods get more and more artificial additives, and the ingredients become more and more homogenous across the range of processed food, allergies are increasing (asthma too). And chemicals from plastics and pollution don't help.

But by and large, these allergies have always been with us, they just haven't been identified. We're much more aware of our diets now, and there's a lot less things to die of, so here we are.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gillen
2006-12-10 05:44 am UTC (link)
Well, yes. Which is why I specifically opened up with the nut allergy. It's not a question of additives or earlier underdiagnosis, and we're talking about children, not people subject to years of exposure to environmental effects. We were as aware of nut allergies in 1997 as in 2002, and yet the observed rate doubled in children - during which we saw no change at all in the adult rates of nut allergy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]si_fuller
2006-12-10 06:37 am UTC (link)
Peanuts are a special case, it's not really fair to group that in with the others.

Apparently a lot of the problem with peanuts is that children are exposed to them too early, before their immune systems are capable of dealing with them. Not only is the exposure by parents feeding them nuts, but in all manner of food and things like ointments and creams. You're not supposed to give them to children before they're between 1 and 7, depending on who you ask. It could also have to do with modern roasting techniques, or a bunch of other possibilities.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]gillen
2006-12-10 09:05 am UTC (link)
I'm a sophist. I'm not interested in being fair. I'm interested in winning. ;)

That said, the rest of that are cop-outs though.

Yes, nuts appear in quite a number of products, but there's been no sudden upsurge in nut inclusion, nor any particular balms or unguents now common to child-rearing that weren't 20-30 years ago. If anything, nuts are being pulled from products due to sensitivity issues. So if that were a factor, one would expect nut sensitivies in children to be declining. They aren't.

Peanut butter was the daily diet for kids from the high-chair onward back when I was a kid, yet we don't have anything near the rates of nut allergies and our immune systems seemed to have dealt with them just fine. The notion of an age limitation is based almost solely on the existence of the phenomena that it's attempting to address. Yes, keeping nuts away from children will prevent them from exhibiting the symptoms of nut allergy, but it's not going to prevent them from developing one since the exposure to nuts is not what's driving the development of allergies to them.

"Modern roasting techniques"? Yeah, I've heard that one too, but no one's been able to explain how peanuts are roasted differently in the 2000s than they were in the 1980s. Unless Planters has started roasting them in some Monsanto goo.

I suspect the places to look are the places that no one is going to: the pharmaceutical and chemical companies, and we're seeing an effect that can be traced back to either new immunization drugs or the introduction of pesticides like RoundUp.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]akhlut
2006-12-10 04:21 am UTC (link)
If I had to guess, it's because we no longer have to deal with parasitic infections. Our immune systems are primed to be fighting a lot of nasty things, and without anything to fight, they start treating minor things as horribly as they do blood flukes, trypanosomes, and the like.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]askeladden
2006-12-10 05:28 pm UTC (link)
That makes a lot of sense to me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]theflyingghoti
2006-12-10 07:06 pm UTC (link)
That's very interesting; I hadn't heard that particular theory before. Our immune systems are stronger than they should be because they're expecting to be suppressed by parasites. Hm. Unfortunately, not many people (dare I say "not enough"?) are willing to give their kids hookworm.

I doubt there's a single cause for the allergy issue. I think the "bubble boy" philosophy of child-rearing is probably a huge part of it, though.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]askeladden
2006-12-10 07:12 pm UTC (link)
Another article on the subject.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

bubble boy philosophy?
(Anonymous)
2006-12-11 06:14 pm UTC (link)
Where do you get the "bubble boy" philosophy from? Are you a medical doctor or a fictionally based philosopher? How ridiculous...I have a husband (aged 45) and 2 kids that have nut allergies. It wasn't created, it just was. Talk about something you know in the future please.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

something ain't right
[info]nebris
2006-12-10 04:22 am UTC (link)
Yeah. *sigh*

~M~

(Reply to this)


[info]tanyahp
2006-12-10 06:52 pm UTC (link)
Speaking as one of the afflicted (with Crohn's, not peanut allergies, although I've been told to avoid nuts as they could make my symptoms worse) I can vouch for what you say - rates of childhood diagnoses of Crohn's/Colitis/allergies is on the rise. Our society needs to get its shit together, stop polluting, and stop sanitizing the hell out of everything - we're just creating super-resistant bacteria, and doing our internal organs no good deed in the process.

(Reply to this)


[info]askeladden
2006-12-10 07:16 pm UTC (link)
This is why everyone who intends to breed should buy my mom's book, damnit.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]funnel101
2006-12-11 07:21 pm UTC (link)
You know, I think I will get that for my niece's birthday.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dlighe
2006-12-11 12:45 pm UTC (link)
Obviously, it is the decline of civilization, just like the Mayans!!!

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…